Видео

Excellent

Thank you so much

Alternate title: *Chapter 3.4: Karl Marx and the other kind of Fascism*

I vehemently disagree. The greeks figured out everything 2000 years ago. So much of what they wrote can be directly applied to our modern world. Many things are just inherent to the human experience.

Normalizing power sounds similar to the notion of zeitgeist, no?

This video is amazing!!!!!

André Hazes is the best singer of the Netherlands

the lecture is amazing and inspiring so much! thanks a lot!

The speaker is misrepresenting Kuhn, perhaps to promote a radical relativist attitude. Kuhn though scientific paradigms were incommensurable but still comparable, and this does not make science subjective or irrational. Incommensurability just means the concepts in different theories are cross-cutting and cannot be evaluated directly in each other's terms. The theories can still be compared and evaluated rationally using scientific metrics such as predictive power and simplicity. I notice this lecture series later goes full pseudo-science woo-woo with Foucault and Structuralism, so any rational viewers should bail out at this point.

Most histories of the WWII explain it largely in terms of major collective forces rather than merely individual decisions. This is totally commonplace. The role of unnoticed assumptions in thinking is maybe not quite so tediously banal, but still, not a surprise to any educated person. By the way, standing up and gesticulating is less effective than sitting at your desk, and that shirt sucks. Nudity would have added momentary interest, but ultimately would distract from your content.

There's an obvious problem here though. Our goals are also constituted by language. In this presentation at least, Rorty does not account for the origins of these goals, of named desires. You need something like psychoanalysis to explain how you can posit a goal, aim for it, miss the target, reconstitute the goal, etc etc I appreciated your video, very clear and gives you something to think about

Zoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo leuk was deze video

praat nederlands met me even nederlands met me

These comments seem fake or nah? If i were trying to sell classes, these are exactly the comments i would have on my videos... "Saved my paper" "i learned more in 9 minutes than a whole 3 hour class".... I'm not sure who's buying, but it sure as fuck won't be me. Don't like it? Blame capitalism. In a video.

As a subjectivist who studies social sciences, i really agree with kuhn!

You are just like Jesus

I'm in fact, a freezer resistant frog.

Jesus himself has to come down to teach us lesser beings the arts of logic. 😮

inductive Argument, Deductive Arguments are confusiong the whole process because this two want to change the premises of the Argument... Don't get it...

I am only here for the shirts

Hey 👋🏼 new best friend

Foucoult made simple. I think I'll at least be able to swim through the exam rather than drown altogether

This is so helpful…, how I wish you made a video on Imre Lakatos and his MSRP

I suggest you look up falsification in Encyclopedia Britannica. It's free. It seems like you are using straw man arguments which are not in Britannica. I'm not suggesting that Popper did not say the things you said, I am saying that the things you are saying are not in the theory of falsification. If you are simply saying that Popper was not God- perfect, then we are in agreement. Propper and Thomas Kuhn changed Science similarly to Einstein changed Physics. They all made mistakes, they all had flaws, what is the purpose of focusing on them? Perhaps you think that many people consider them to be perfect gods? Do you inform children there is no Santa Claus too?

i was hoping this was the same guy that dropped the legendary Kant lecture i absolutely love this dude!!!

Excellent! Thank you so much, you really helped me. Saludos desde México.

Very nice.

It’s a very useful content

7:00 Shakespeare wrote a beautiful speech about honour in Henry IV part 1 spoken by the legendary Falstaff.

Isn't it wrong to declare that natural events don't mean anything? For example, the fall of an apple in a society that rejects gravity could very well mean to revolt against the status quo. I argue that all things have meaning because meaning itself is constructed by people and societies.

Can unsound argument be valid? If yes give examples

Minute 5:10, Actually, that's the mystery of human ability to learn a language. We somehow "know" that the sound "bread" means a concept, not just the piece of bread being referred to at a given time.

Fantastic ideas but one critique: disability representation was lacking. There was one person featured using sign language, but otherwise there featured lots of able bodied people enjoying campus, accessing spaces via stairs and using skateboards and bicycles to move around. It would have been good to see how those spaces have been made accessible for wheel chair users as well. As a person with MS, I appreciate that not all disability is visible, but some clear indicators of this representation are vital considering the message of the video. Thank you

I really feel confident that I will pass my exam on philosophy of science :) THANK YOU SO MUCH.

È una bella poesia. Purtroppo vi sono errori di copiatura ("sorridi agli amori finiti (non finite)", e Sorridi donna, sarebbe "lach/glimlach, vrouw", non "glimlachende vrouw", che sarebbe "donna sorridente".../ "sorridente donna...".

Why do I wear cloths? I'm going to run with THAT one!

as a highschooler and philosophy taker who misses many classes because of chronic illness, this guy really saves my grades 💪

This helped so so much. I have to write a philosophy essay on this topic and I just could not get a grasp on it. THANK YOU

Victor Gijsbers is a terrific teacher!

Victor is a superb teacher ... his lectures are clear, informative, insightful, efficient, and highly enjoyable!

Thank you

Very high quality lectures with efficient delivery of key points in an easy casual style. Thank you!

Victor Gijsbers' lectures are fantastic!

Thanks for sharing, The video was very informative

Is that really how one pronounces episteme? I have been mispronouncing this for years.

I learn this really hard

Great explanation, thanks!